Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: allen menglin chen who wrote (6450)	1/30/2000 4:17:00 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

35 would be a short squeeze I believe :) So would 50. Didn't got(sic) killed last round, SS @ 18, and covered @ 16.5 after it ran to 20. If GUMM passes 35 this time, I'll cover @ 28 -- I don't believe your guys can keep buying GUMM and take no profits. If, of course, the stock accommodates your unfortunate position. You just need a good scare. Actually profits are being taken all along. This is why, despite the increasing volume (institutional buying), the stock is only rising in bits and pieces. What has happened in the last 2 months that caused GUMM doubled(sic) from 15 to 30 Mike? You bought 5 cases of GUMM and stored them in your garage? Make sure you keep your receipt for refund after the Q report. And I thought you were clueless. P.S. A proverb for your consideration: *The foolish man seeks happiness in the distance, the wise grows it under his feet.*