Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (36822)	1/31/2000 7:52:00 PM
From: Fiscally Conservative	Respond to of 93625

The way I see it. Remember,who brought the lawsuit? Rambus will make their case and it will be up to the rest of them to defend it.ummmm. These guys are scared!

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (36822)	1/31/2000 9:27:00 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Even if elements of the RDRAM were present in earlier RAM developments, it is unlikely that all elements of the design were present. If they were all present no one would have bought a license from RAMBUS. The patents could stand by way of combination. The burden of proof is on the infringees to prove that the inventions existed prior to patenting. Even if the elements did exist there could be lack proper publication of those elements. There is also the problem of reduction to practice which seems to have been non-trivial.