Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (74894)	1/31/2000 1:19:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 132070

>>Which was a good thing as they were some of the dimmest bulbs in the chandelier. << the dark chandelier? the VERY dark chandelier? ;-)

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (74894)	1/31/2000 10:33:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

To All, Put update. So far this morning, Abbey Jo's stab at touting up IBM because bad business is good for the stock doesn't seem to be sticking. Ditto for Barron's psalm of love for Dell, though their Compaq scamarama seems to be having some impact. Safeguard Scientific is a mildly volatile stock. 170 one day, 130 the next, back to the mid 160s, then back to the mid 130s. It is fun. I don't have much of a position here, but it is interesting. The Latin phone cos. are finally getting a mild dose of reality. For some reason, Intel has ticked up on lower pc sales and losing market share. Maybe the portfolio is doing so bad that they have to take some more gains to pad eps. <g>