Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Savant who wrote (10396)	1/31/2000 6:22:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

Thanks for the ATCO update. It sure doesn't seem to be as bad as the writer suggested. And since when were three stocks in R&D phases considered problem companies. I guess under Kupper's principles we should stop giving grants to NIH scientists or MIT physicists and TERA should stop working on that big computer. Maybe all that biotech money is just a waste of time. I mean what's the matter with Woody Norris? Wasting all that time doing research and development. He should have been going door to door selling dictation devices or hawking eight-track recording machines in distant markets. Yes, taking time to work on something that can only be used in the future is pretty stupid thing to do, ain't it Mr. Kupper, staff writer for the San Diego Union-Tribune? Basically, we can conclude from Kupper's article that R&D eqivocates to stock manipulation; that the RagingBull stock forum participants ran EDIG's stock price to artificial heights, not the CES 2000 Convention; and that boilerplate accounting language to protect against accountants from liability in audits means more than the three million dollars in new EDIG orders, or other recent deals signed with OEMs. Can anyone state with confidence that Thomas Kupper isn't really MollyHatchet over on the RB thread or Pluvia on the SI thread? He's gotta be one of the two, or both--(LOL) I know this much. If ever I need opinion in financial matters, I now know to consult a financial expert and not a staff writer of a local newspaper.