Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 10:43:00 AM
From: JohnG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Everyone can understand the tactics by which single battles are won, but few can see the overall strategies whinc lead to great victories. It is probably true right now at this point in time that QCOM has the standards game in the bag but only a select few at QCOM know the whole battle plan--and they seek to disarm the unsuspecting. Look for NOK, AT&T, MOT, ERICY, the IDC FUDmongers and the whole host of detracters to scurry for cover in the very near future. AT that time, it will just be too late to pick up Q for 110. Sure wish I had dumped my IRA QCOM stock back on 1/3 so I could get this 2X factor. JOhnG

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 10:48:00 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 152472

The LA Times published a story on Hedy Lamarr today that is pretty accurate. latimes.com

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 10:48:00 AM
From: Jill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Engineer, consider that without input like yours it's hard to distinguish the verity of some of these posts. It was a question brought up on my own thread and where else would I go to clarify it? I'm not trying to waste thread time on snakes, nor am I trying to take potshots at QCOM. A spirit of helpfulenss and exchange of info is the point of these threads, I believe.

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 11:02:00 AM
From: JohnG	Respond to of 152472

Engineer. Thanks so much for reassuring us with your expert post in IDC & patents. Your contributions and those of the other technical people have helped us all keep our cool when these untrue stories are promoted. JOhnG

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 12:37:00 PM
From: freeus	Respond to of 152472

Thank you so much, Freeus

To: engineer who wrote (65427)	1/31/2000 1:09:00 PM
From: Cooters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

engineer, Thanks for the information, as always. Cooters PS - The Globalstar worked at 24,000 feet and the reception was excellent. I did need to point the antenna toward the southwest(Texas), so I'm not sure it would have worked on the other side of the plane. AND... the Rams won!