SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Y. Samuel Arai who wrote (90633)1/31/2000 3:07:00 PM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1570973
 
Sam, re:<It will have the largest selection of games, as it will run regular PC-based games...that's how it'll compete>
Tench: <<I still have a very tough time seeing how that thing will compete against Sony's Playstation II>>
zdnet.com

The ZDNet article is the most reputable source who has repeated the Athlon rumor. I think the target price for this hybrid PC/gaming console is more likely to be $400 rather than $200. $100 for the CPU sounds about right even if M$oft decides to sell the console at a loss to gain the gaming revenue stream.

Since the custom Sony chip is supposed to be over 200mm large, the cost of an Athlon chip at ~100 mm is quite competitive with it.

If this box is ready in time, I could see it getting 10% of the market for Christmas 2000. How many Athlon chips would that be?

Petz



To: Y. Samuel Arai who wrote (90633)1/31/2000 3:09:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1570973
 
Microsoft's game console: <It will have the largest selection of games, as it will run regular PC-based games...that's how it'll compete.>

That means the console will need some sort of storage medium (add more $$$ to the cost), since all PC games at the moment must be installed first before they can be run. When was the last time a game console forced the user to install a game before playing it?

<On top of that, software engineers will be able to fine-tune their games for this console, instead of having to write their code to be playable on everything from a Pentium 233MMX to an Athlon 1000mhz.>

That's real nice, but if the game writers want their games to run on any PC, not just the niche Microsoft gamebox market, they'll have to do cross-development anyway. Otherwise, the game writer will have to gamble on an unestablished platform.

There's way too many questions here, way too many risks I see. PC games are just way too different from console games. Believe me, as an avid gamer who plays both console and PC games, I know.

Tenchusatsu