Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob who wrote (10474)	2/1/2000 1:17:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18366

bob wrote: "Safe Harbour statements have no basis in my investment decisions" The statement made by the CPA that was referenced in the U-T article was NOT a "safe harbour" statement. It was a statement by the CPA doubting the viability of the company as a going concern. It's basically a statement on the part of the CPA that they do not see how the company can continue to exist. They are saying that the company has no financial viability. This type of statement in an audit is very, very rare. CPA's don't like to make this type of statement, because it normally means the end of the relationship between the company and the CPA. (One way or the other. :) )

To: bob who wrote (10474)	2/1/2000 8:58:00 AM
From: sdr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

Bob, I think the float is closer to 50,000,000 - SDR

To: bob who wrote (10474)	2/1/2000 10:58:00 AM
From: Starlight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

Bob - Your post makes a very legitimate statement: There are risks here, we KNOW it, and we've chosen to take them. I guess some people don't understand why anyone would take a risk such as this, but you don't go into penny stocks to make 6-10% a year. You buy bonds for that. As I've said before, it's very wise to have a DIVERSIFIED portfolio. If you aren't diversified, you're at much greater risk. Meanwhile, if "all your bases are covered", why not go for a risky situation if the potential rewards are great. Betty