Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (90851)	2/1/2000 2:33:00 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577025

PB, re: A0, A1, etc. Your explanations make sense. Is it reasonable to assume that it is the A1 silicon which booted Windows NT? Two months after "buggy" A0 silicon seems a little tight, no? Maybe the "booting NT" part is totally bogus and is actually talking about Merced. Petz

To: Process Boy who wrote (90851)	2/1/2000 3:00:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577025

PETZ!!! No wonder that report is so confusing. There's 3 different reports / rumors in one blurb!! One is accurate, ONE IS CONFUSED, ONE IS BOGUS. I read the threads on the subject over there. One guy claiming inside sources is right on, the other one is bogus. You are going to think I'm a party pooper, but I'm not going to spill the beans which one is correct (SORRY TWY!). Honest, it's really academic anyway. It is where it is, so to say :-). PB