Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Arbitrage Plays -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Allen Furlan who wrote (156)	2/1/2000 1:16:00 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 376

AMAT's takeover of ETEC presents a nice arbitrage opportunity. AMAT and ETEC have agreed to merge, with ETEC shareholders receiving 0.692 shares of AMAT for each share of ETEC. Both companies manufacture semiconductor manufacturing equipment. The merger is subject to shareholder approval and regulatory approval. At this moment, ETEC is trading for 84.5, which is a discount of about 5 3/8 points, compared to the value of the underlying AMAT shares, based on AMAT's current price at 138.5. If you watch the stocks, the discount fluctuates intra-day between 4 and 7 points. I shorted AMAT, and immediately bought an offsetting ETEC long position. To insure the position, I then bought out-of-the money ETEC puts and paid for the premium on these options by writing covered puts on the short AMAT position. The net effect of these transactions, net of trading costs, was to give me about 4 points of cash, which I hope to keep if the merger goes through. In that scenario, the options will expire worthless and the broker will journal out the short and long AMAT positions after the merger. I'll pay no commissions and no trading costs to close the positions. In the worst case (the deal folds) I'll lose maybe 20 points before the ETEC puts are in the money, providing a cap on the loss. So, I'm betting that the odds of the merger going through are better than 5:1. I don't see a significant risk that the merger could fail, for the following reasons: * they are both big companies that know what they are doing, * AMAT has huge financial resources, * the takeover is friendly, * the industry is in a cyclical upswing that is forecasted by Dataquest to continue until 2002, * the companies don't compete so there's no possibility of an antitrust problem. Here's the announcement of the merger: biz.yahoo.com Here's the 10k for AMAT: freeedgar.com

To: Allen Furlan who wrote (156)	2/1/2000 6:48:00 PM
From: Keith J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 376

Allen, Average price of FNF and total consideration: 10 - 44.07 11 - 45.88 12 - 47.51 13 - 49.01 14 - 50.50 KJ

To: Allen Furlan who wrote (156)	2/1/2000 9:03:00 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 376

Yes, your eyeball may have jumped a line there (p.7) in reading the row amounts for average share price of 12.00. Value of stock portion is 15.06, not 13.81. Total merger consideration is $47.51 as noted per Keith's post on total consideration amount for each of six different possible avg. sh. price amounts. I just hope the execs and their boards will be acommodating to these price changes that may need to be made. I see (p. 7) that "a determination as to whether or not to terminate the merger agreement would by made by Chicago Title's board of directors..." - the stockholders aren't directly involved. Paul