SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (90899)2/1/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1572342
 
Tenchusatsu,

<CAS2 PC133 is about as tough to find as RDRAM. Plus, I really don't think the performance difference between CAS2 and CAS3 is very significant. It's probably as insignificant as the difference between Virtual Channel SDRAM and regular SDRAM. (Perhaps that's why all of the hype surrounding Virtual Channel and CAS2 has died down.)>

Yeah, the difference will not be that large but a point here and a point there can add-up pretty fast.

<I've always knew that PC133 would be just a stop-gap solution between PC100 and RDRAM (or DDR SDRAM). Athlon just isn't going to get a tangible performance boost from the chipset until they start supporting DDR, whenever that'll be.>

This may have more to do with VIA implementation than PC133 itself. Nonetheless, I expect to improve the integer results a little bit and FP results a little bit more.

Chuck



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (90899)2/1/2000 3:10:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1572342
 
Tench - RE: "CAS2 PC133 is about as tough to find as RDRAM."

But it is available now at MUCH lower prices than RDRAM. I bought 64MB of CAS 3 PC133 RAM from Crucial a couple of weeks ago and now they are offering CAS 2 for the same price...



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (90899)2/1/2000 3:41:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572342
 
Tench, Winstone 99 benchmark improvement using PC133 vs PC100 was either 2.7% or 5.6%. Can you tell me what percentage improvement a 600E Coppermine gets on Winstone 99 when using RDRAM and i820 chipset vs. using SDRAM on BX chipset?

Hint, try looking at www6.tomshardware.com

OK, its Sysmark business instead of Winstone but the results are:
RDRAM is 0.4% SLOWER than PC100 under Windows 98
RDRAM is identical to PC100 under Windows NT.


Petz