Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: moufassa7 who wrote (51003)	2/1/2000 2:54:00 PM
From: allen menglin chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

SS EWEB another 25% @ 10 1/2! ANother 25% @ 11.5 ================================ Same here, no ANDR borrow from SCH or WaterHouse.

To: moufassa7 who wrote (51003)	2/1/2000 2:54:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

ANDR<-------------SCUM STOCK!!!!! LAWSUIT MONEY LAUNDERING!!!! Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. et al. and Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. et al As originally reported in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 1997, in July 1996, two companion lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, by various owners and operators of the Ventron-Velsicol Superfund Site (Site). The lawsuits, which were subsequently consolidated, were filed under the Comprehensive Environmental Resource Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation and -------------------------------------------------------- Avisma Titano - Magnesium Kombinat v. Dart Management, Inc., Andersen Group, Inc., Francis E. Baker et al On August 18, 1999, Avisma Titano - Magnesium Kombinat ("Avisma"), an industria company located in Berezniki, Sverdlovsk, Russian Federation, and organize under the laws of the Russian Federation, filed suit in the United State District Court in New Jersey against numerous shareholder parties, including among others, the Company and the Company's Chairman, Francis E. Baker Recently, on December 10, 1999, Avisma filed an amended Complaint in which among other things, the Company was dropped from the lawsuit and is thus n longer a party defendant. Mr. Baker, who also serves as a Director of th company, remains a named defendant. The suit purportedly seeks to recover in excess of $150 million in damage allegedly arising out of harm allegedly caused by fraud and "money laundering" that is, in which it was claimed that funds were purportedly misappropriate away from Avisma for the benefit of the Western-based investor group of which the Company and certain Directors are a part. The Company and Mr. Baker have denied any and all wrong doing alleged by the plaintiff and believe that this lawsuit was and continues to be motivated for purposes of using inflammatory allegations in the U.S. to gain some kind of "leverage" in on-going business relations in which the investors are seeking to bring Western-style accounting and management controls to and for the benefit of the Russian company and its shareholders. As previously disclosed in various of its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, both the Company and Mr. Baker, along with other members of the Company's Board of Directors, made an investment in Avisma, and, by virtue of the merger of Avisma into another Russian Federation corporation (namely, "VSMPO") in 1998, currently still holds a small, minority investment interest through the holdings of VSMPO stock.