Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : St. Jude Resources......V.SJD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (2788)	2/2/2000 1:43:00 AM
From: Ron Everest	Respond to of 3065

Russ, thanks for the post. SJD would be the 49% partner referred to in the release. See: Message 11184732 Correct me if this is incorrect. Guess we can assume that SJD will also make a NR tomorrow? Best regards, Ron E

To: russwinter who wrote (2788)	2/2/2000 7:35:00 AM
From: David R. Schaller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3065

Russ, 5 million tonnes at an average of even 3grm/t would seem to indicate about 500,000 ounces. Not sure if this is enough to get market very excited. The fact that most of the deposit is shallow and shouldn't be too expensive to mine helps..but we still haven't outlined a very large deposit so far. Dave

To: russwinter who wrote (2788)	2/2/2000 4:11:00 PM
From: Fishfinder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3065

2.4m tons at 6.4gpt =548570oz 2.6m tons at 4.1gpt= 380710oz therefore total oz = 929280 oz and that is so far. And they didn't include the surface enrichment which is pretty impressive as well. Didn't Barrick buy the deep shaft deposit off Sutton for around $60 oz. SJDs mine will be shallow low cost open pit with an existing road retwork right there. Minutes fron the ocean yet the stock is trading at less than cash. I mean what the hell---------- even at $30 bucks this stock is short by close to 14million bucks. And this deposit is still open at depth and at the ends. Funny times Scott