Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (65502)	2/2/2000 1:07:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

So sorry. I will translate in a bit.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (65502)	2/2/2000 10:47:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

If somebody tried to defined murder, they would be doing it just on their own thinking. Why do I say this? I say it because there ain't no dang universal definition of murder just floatin' out there anywheres. Some guy will claim killing somebody for sleeping with his wife is just fine. But somebody else will say its murder. Who is right? Now with abortion some folk like to say the "foetus" ain' human. But how do they know? They don't, but they go on an act like they know. Try to get one of 'em to describe some kinda law that automatically and reasonably separates them from the unborn child, and they'll start talking about junk like "viability" and "brain development" and stupid stuff like that. Nevermind that all this stuff can be turned right around against some guy who is already born. So then what kinda thinking allows them to kill kids like they do? None, 'cause it ain't thinking at all. They do it because they can do it. That's the only reason. It's pure murderous barbarism. Now, why can't that same kinda barbarism be used to excuse killing other folk? No reason at all. That's just the way barbarism is. It ain't got no kinda logic or sound ethic or moral philosophy behind it. Folk just wanna kill for convenience and be done with it. So that's just what they do-- just like filthy barbarians. Defining murder won't do nothing as long as folk will define it so as to keep a door open to abortion. Cause the same door that allows them to keep going in and killing children can (and I think eventually will) allow them to go in and kill other kinds of folk. Hey, the whole euthanasia thing has its logical foot in the abortion door. And a whole lotta other kinds of "asias" got their foots in that same dang door. The only thing that's gonna do something is for folk to think for a change and see how that little unborn kid is one of them, but in miniature. Heck, even the term "miniature" is relative. I was ten pounds eleven ounces just before my birth (and right afterward too). Bigger than many born children. So the truth is, unborn children are just us -- period. And the only real reasonable solution is for scientists and other knowledgeable folk to not be to scared to stand up and learn us. But hey, there are folk who don't wanna be bothered with the truth and stuff. They'd rather just ignore it so they can keep killing out of convenience. (--my friend coey claims men are evil, but she should really be thinking the same about women too). Why not just let 'em kill then? (They deserve it anyway) Why not just let 'em kill even after their children are born? If we let 'em kill kids before they are born, we should let 'em kill 'em afterward too. I say let 'em kill until they puke from it-- but just on their own nickle.