Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Lucero Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jerry janko who wrote (670)	2/2/2000 10:34:00 AM
From: jerry janko	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 703

Very interesting points raised by Oldlaw from bullboards thread:::: - From Nov 1 to Dec 15 MMI traded 1.29 million shares at an average price of .16. - Canaccord gross sold 383K, Golden Cap: 252K, and PI: 100K under .20. - Starting Dec 15, MMI moved from an intraday low of .17 to an intraday high of .56 in 4 trading days. - On Dec 23 MMI went from an intraday low of .38 to an intraday high of .83 in 7 days. - On Jan 11 MMI went from a low of .52 to a high of 1.48 in 10 trading days. - Volume was up over 400 % from Nov to Dec. - Volume was up about 50% from Dec. to Jan. - Backflip publicity helped MMI to break out in mid-Dec. - On Jan. 5, Steve Harmon said that Yahoo! or AOL, should acquire Backflip if they want to prevent a rival from growing. - On Jan 6 MMI hit an intraday high of .83. - On Jan 25 Ask Jeeves acquired Direct hit. - MMI hit an intraday high of 1.48 - MMI has not put out a news release since Nov 25, except when forced to. MMI paid $500,000.00 to earn 35% of ThoughtShare's technology. The R and D costs are over $7 million in SFU dollars. We all know that the Technology Access organization ranks Simon Fraser University #1 in North America for cost-effective creation of intellectual property and spin-off companies. How was MMI so lucky to get such a good deal, and why should they get more? How can MMI gain a larger percentage in ThoughtShare, and where will it come from? Will it come from DNA Media Services (26.8%), or SFU (19.1%), or the TSCI (19.1%) principals? Was MMI and TSCI planning a reverse takeover, by issuing a certain amount (several million) of MMI shares (to TSCI) and gain control? Was this based on a certain dollar value, and a PP that fell apart when the stock doubled? Would MMI want the price to drop under $1.00 again in order to close the deal, and PP that they were working on? Will the delay in negotiating a deal slow down the funding needed to complete a commercial version of CZWEB? No matter how this turns out. 35% of TSCI, will soon be worth many times more than today's price.