SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigBull who wrote (59593)2/2/2000 1:34:00 PM
From: Wowzer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
I just set my self up today. With the 10 million draw and higher oil futures I thought we would really rock today. Should of known better. Also, if this sector is worried about a 1/4 to 1/2 point rise in rates, maybe I am in the wrong sector as well. A 1/4 to 1/2 point rise doesn't seem to be bothering the bond today...

Rory



To: BigBull who wrote (59593)2/2/2000 2:07:00 PM
From: Roebear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
BigBull,
NEWSFLASH, Big Al ain't gonna say a word till he knocks oil down to 27 anyway. Just kidding, but when the heck is he going to announce anyway so I can get on with my trading life!

I thought it was 1:00 PM EST

Roebear



To: BigBull who wrote (59593)2/2/2000 2:19:00 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
TBI vs MAVK? I was just comparing MAVK and TBI and TBI seems like the better bet, but I now have positions in both. I like TBI a little better technically. It's also cheaper based on forward earnings and is twice the size of MAVK. However, the volume is very low on TBI which I don't like. I think it may take MAVK a little longer to get their new plant up and running than originally planned.

TBI's debt was recently upgraded by S&P to stable from negative.

biz.yahoo.com

Opinions? I'm new to this area of the oil sector.