Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Munch-a-Biotech Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aknahow who wrote (823)	2/2/2000 10:05:00 PM
From: Biomaven	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3158

Boy, I had thought the law in this area was quite settled: In 1935, the New Jersey Legislature in reaction to prolific litigation, barred any causes of action to recover monetary damages for "alienation of affections, criminal conversations, seduction or breach of contract to marry." You can no longer sue the lover who wooed your spouse from you and thereby deprived you of love and affection; or the fiance for reneging on the marriage. The Courts view these causes, as they did all interspousal torts, and cases they call "fruitful sources of blackmail" as being subject to fraud Kleinow v. Ameika, 19 N.J.Super 165, 88 A2d. 31 (Law Div. 1952); Hofner v. Hofner, 135 N.J.Super 328, 343 A2d. 165 (Law Div.1975); Koslowski v. Koslowski, 64 N.J.Super 162, 395 A2d. 913 (Ch.Div. 1978) aff'd. 80 N.J. 378, 403 A2d 698, (1979). stolen from: gourvitz.com Peter