To: Pigboy who wrote (98137 ) 2/3/2000 1:26:00 PM From: carl a. mehr Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
Pigboy, Here is the text that you may have overlook in the reference I gave: <<In late 1939, Atanasoff teamed up with Berry to build the prototype, of the first computing machine to use electricity, vacuum tubes, binary numbers, and capacitors in a rotating drum which held the electrical charge for the memory. The brilliant and inventive Berry, with his background in electronics and mechanical construction skills was the ideal partner for Atanasoff. The prototype won the design team a grant of $850 to build a full-scale computer, they spent the next two years further improving the Atanasoff Berry Computer, which ended up being the size of a desk, weighing 700 pounds, having over 300 vacuum tubes, and a mile of wire. It could do about one operation every 15 seconds, today a computer today can do 150 billion operations in 15 seconds. Too large to go anywhere, it remained in the basement of the physics department, where it was built, the war effort prevented Atanasoff from finishing the patent process and doing any further work on the ABC. The ABC, was dismantled when it's storage space in the physics building was needed.>> Transister was not needed to make the early day computers. Vacuum tubes did the job. In 1956 and 1957 I was a Customer Engineer for IBM in Santa Monica. I helped service an IBM 704 and an IBM 705 at Hughes Aircraft in Inglewood and also the same type of machines at North American in Downey. Each of these computers consisted of 5-6 thousand vacuum tubes and required an awful lot of air-conditioning. Yes, I was there in the middle of world where it was all happening as a young person with lots of energy. The high speed printers drove me nuts, however, and forced me to make a quick exit for college. I have seen the evolution of computers from Day One and the speed is getting dizzying! I am so confident of what the future holds for shareholders of Intel, Microsoft and Cisco, that I multiply the values of those stocks in my portfolio by 10,12 and 27, respectively, to obtain an approximate value of what my portfolio will look like in 5 years. I will probably error on the low side, because the next 5 years will without doubt be even more dynamic than the last. It has never been easier to prosper. If I now could only sell my name...humble eCarl