SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ronald J. Clark who wrote (59666)2/3/2000 1:48:00 PM
From: Ken Ludwig  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95453
 
And more jawboning. The headline was in very large type and later we find this economist is merely speculating. Ain't we got fun.

OPEC Seen Boosting Oil Output in March

REUTERS INDEX | INTERNATIONAL | BUSINESS | TECHNOLOGY

Filed at 1:14 p.m. ET

By Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Economic self-interest should compel
OPEC to raise crude oil production this year by about two million barrels
a day, and this could occur as early as its March meeting, World Bank
officials told reporters.

The 11-member Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries is facing
growing political pressure from big customers, such as the United States,
to ramp up production and contain world oil prices, which have nearly
tripled over the past year.

``We think the most likely scenario is in March they will raise
production,' Shane Streifel, energy economist for the World Bank, told a
briefing in advance of Thursday's release of the Bank's quarterly
commodity forecast.

The increase could be as much as two million barrels per day, based on
the International Energy Agency's estimate of the gap between world
consumption and output in the first quarter, he said. The meeting is
scheduled to begin on March 27.

The economists cautioned it was also possible that OPEC would decide
at its meeting next month not to increase production. ``It's not a foregone
conclusion,' Streifel said.

The cartel could also choose to gradually increase output over a period
of months to keep prices firmly underpinned, the economists noted.

But without OPEC pumping more oil into the market, prices may rise
substantially from current prices of around $28 a barrel, Streifel said.

Skyrocketing prices could jolt the economies of many countries, and
offer a tempting incentive for non-OPEC producers to increase their own
exploration and production, Streifel said.

``If prices remain high, it becomes very, very profitable to explore and
develop oil,' he said, noting that some non-OPEC members have already
started those efforts.

U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson has launched a round of
diplomatic talks with energy ministers in Norway and Mexico, and will
travel to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait later this month for talks about volatile
oil prices. The Clinton administration, which insists it is not trying to
pressure OPEC to increase output, is also considering a proposal to
release oil from the nation's emergency stockpile to ease prices.

Based on the assumption that OPEC will increase output, the World
Bank forecast oil prices would begin dropping after the first quarter of
2000 and eventually settle below $20 per barrel, Streifel said.

How quickly oil prices could fall to that level will depend on the size and
timing of OPEC's decision, he said.

In March 1999, OPEC decided to cut production by nearly five million
barrels per day, three months after world oil prices skidded to $10 a
barrel. The cartel has been unusually disciplined, with relatively little
cheating by members, according to oil industry analysts.

The slash in production has trimmed global oil stocks to their lowest level
in decades, said Don Mitchell, the principal economist for the World
Bank's commodity team.

If OPEC decides not to increase production, as members have suggested
might be the case, ``you could see a sustained period of high prices',
Mitchell said.

Over the long term, plentiful world oil supplies should eventually pull
prices down, he said.