Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Kelly who wrote (27200)	2/4/2000 12:13:00 PM
From: rudedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

David - re: Besides the performance data reported by ZD net was wrong and it doesn't perform as well as NT4. I agree with much of what you said but not on this point. I have been using both the server and workstation versions of Win2K for almost a year and am now running RC3 (which is the production code)... the performance on most things is substantially better, some things are 40% to 50% faster, and in areas where better large addressing makes a difference, performance is about double... I have not found anything which is slower... and the system is much more reliable than NT4, and requires almost no shutdowns for routine configuration changes. So on the performance score I beg to differ... Win2K is faster than NT4.