To: Dr. Id who wrote (17189 ) 2/4/2000 5:05:00 PM From: John Stichnoth Respond to of 54805
re: Hunting for Adolescents I see you've gotten responses already, while I was off picking up the kids, etc. But, I'll post my answer anyway-- We want to catch the Gorillas while they are growing from children to adulthood. That is when they really start to put some muscle on their bones. A table of Pongoids in their various states: Start of Year Ago Current Zacks 5 Years Tornado MC Mkt Cap Mkt Cap ------------- -------- ------- --------- ibm ? ? 175.7Bn 211.1Bn 12.7% intc 7/86 2.7Bn 227.8Bn 348.1Bn 19.7% msft 3/86 1.0Bn 410.2Bn 536.2Bn 24.5% csco 1/90 .6Bn 196.5Bn 403.1Bn 29.7% qcom 8/98 1.7Bn 5.4Bn 98.6Bn 34.9% jdsu 11/98 3.9Bn 5.0Bn 61.9Bn 47 % As growth rates start to slow, growth in market cap--and therefore share price--starts to slow. There was a time to hold IBM as the growth stock. That mantle then passed to Wintel. Then Cisco. In 1999 the places to be were qcom and jdsu. And, going forward, in terms of "confirmed" Gorillas or Kings, csco, qcom and jdsu are the places to be. Remember that downside surprises are less likely during the tornado, and upside surprises are more likely. Contrast IBM's nasty surprises a few years ago, as it suddenly became clear that IBM was no longer a growth stock. Subsequently, we have seen Intel and Microsoft handle expectations so they "always" make their number. Slightly less "mature" Cisco similarly always beats the number by a penny, and has not had to have as heavy a hand in giving guidance tot he analysts. For QCOM and JDSU, the analysts are playing catch-up. Since we see a practical limit on market cap for any of our Gorillas (say at $400 Bn in today's dollars), then QCOM last year moved 1/4 of the way from its "childhood" mkt cap to its silverback cap. It will still quadruple before it slows down and begins acting the part of the young adult, like Cisco. JDSU has moved 15% of the way, and still can sextuple before it begins to act like Cisco. (And, sextupling is very good!) Of course, those numbers are order of magnitude--and presume that each Gorilla's ultimate market is of equivalent size and profitability. (Which they aren't, but looking that far ahead there's no way of knowing how big the markets will become). The exercise is to find next year's new pubescent gorilla. Not just doubles in price. 10-baggers in a year, and 100-baggers in a decade. At least, that's what I'm looking for. Best, John