SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Earlie who wrote (75208)2/4/2000 3:58:00 PM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Earlie, I just posted something similar to Barb, but seriously, aren't Goldman Sachs too big too fail? <ng>

Regards,
Terry



To: Earlie who wrote (75208)2/4/2000 3:59:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Earlie,

>>With one nipple already in the wringers courtesy of bonds, did GS engage the other via gold?<<

Sometimes you really warm my heart. (g)



To: Earlie who wrote (75208)2/5/2000 1:11:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 132070
 
I think that watching a nice, orderly liquidation of Goldman, Sachs would be more fun than a cruise. Such things can happen. I had to wait a long time, but I still recall with much pleasure the day that Richard Nixon resigned. I had him figured out in 1959, but it took an awfully long time before he went politically bankrupt.



To: Earlie who wrote (75208)2/5/2000 1:16:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Among the commentaries on Goldman--

Message 12780085