SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (48014)2/4/2000 6:21:00 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116752
 
The greater fool might be the person who waits till Barrick renounces continuation of hedging. But then I expect you always miss the boat? And of course you're the guy who said that Barrick should not be bought because it was going down to $12? But didn't have the bottle to go short. Just as well as it turns out. And if the price of gold continues to soar you can bet your bottom dollar that many producers will hedge again - because they will get that uneasy feeling that what goes up so fast can come down equally fast. Wait and see. In the corporate world nothing is forever.



To: Ken Benes who wrote (48014)2/4/2000 10:29:00 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116752
 
IMHO Why bother with those which are now or will in future renounce hedging? There is HM which renounced all hedging quite some tiem ago(all but the minimum reqd. to keep credit rating). AU has been the same light hedge position for ages. Harmony has been reported as having none, as has GOLD.
The list is quite large.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News