Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (65569)	2/4/2000 9:42:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Government spending never satisfies anyone. We don't permit others to limit what our government spends our money on . Why start now with the anti abortion people? It's as good a place as any. Government should be spending far less of our money in many different areas, IMO. Religious conservatives view abortion as murder and want to ban it. Liberals want it to remain legal, unfettered, and fully funded by tax dollars. I believe that the choice should remain between a woman and her conscience and her doctor. No government funds and no government interference. You might say that poor women won't have a choice then? I say let pro choice organizations put up the money. I'm sure that they and their backers can afford it. I'll take private charity, of any flavor, over "entitlements" and government nannyism any day.