SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (98305)2/5/2000 6:36:00 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 186894
 
Monica,

re:"Typical Intel personal attack"

Have a nice day!

steve



To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (98305)2/5/2000 6:46:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Monica,
RE:"You do recall what happened to AMD when Intel ramped up their Celeron production in early 1999, don't you?"

Intel just didn't decide to "ramp up" Celeron production. What they did you was increase the speed of the Celerons which had 128k L2 to match the K6-2s (which, unknown to Intel were having CXT core problems) and they lowered they prices. So AMD came out with 400 MHz K6-2s and couldn't deliver and Intel took back much of that segment they had lost. On the other side, Intel left a lot of money on the table because they really didn't need to fire sale the Celerons.

So this time, who jacked up the Mhz and couldn't deliver?

Jim



To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (98305)2/5/2000 7:30:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Monica,

You do recall what happened to AMD when Intel ramped up their Celeron
production in early 1999, don't you?


Actually I think it was Sept. 1998 when Intel introduced Mendocino, the first Celeron with on-die L2 cache. Early 1999 would have left the fox in the henhouse too long.

Tony