Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Theophile who wrote (6290)	2/6/2000 2:52:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Respond to of 13582

got a problem? don't come around here every "Lunar Eclipse" and waste your time complaining about a post that was a mistake on my part,and that i also acknowledged to the thread, my mistake. instead try to dwell on the over "4000 Plus" articles posted, think of someone else's time and effort, and maybe your pedestrian attitude would alter to your senses, and fufill your objective premise. Ruff

To: Theophile who wrote (6290)	2/6/2000 3:06:00 PM
From: Quincy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Um... Excuse me. But since my userid has popped up in the "arrogant group", I must apologize to Ruffian. I needed the first article to make a point. Someone spreading FUD on a non-IDC thread had lost sight of something very important to me: no matter what the bandwidth, Q has IPR on WCDMA. All other instances of this information have since been deleted off of their respective servers (RCR news, WirelessWeek) The Asian article was the only one I could locate. It is my fault for not explaining myself. Ok?