SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (91937)2/7/2000 7:04:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576346
 
Elmer,

Message 12802266

"The chip didn't use any special cooling devices."

Maybe some pictures later, or someone saw it....

steve



To: Elmer who wrote (91937)2/7/2000 7:25:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576346
 
DumbA$$ Elmer,

Re:"Now can someone confirm that it uses conventional cooling?"

You got it "WRONG AGAIN -- DUMBA$$".

The AMD 1.1 Ghz chips don't need NO STICKIN Special Cooling.

But I hear that "YOUSEF's SHORTS require SPECIAL COOLING".

They have been OVERHEATING of late.

Oh heard any more "LIES" lately - OLE FU*D.



To: Elmer who wrote (91937)2/7/2000 8:10:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1576346
 
Elmer - RE: "Now can someone confirm that it uses conventional cooling?"

Edit - Looks like someone else already answered this one.



To: Elmer who wrote (91937)2/7/2000 8:49:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576346
 
Elmer Re <<Now can someone confirm that it uses conventional cooling?>>

No, it must have been Cryo-cooled.

Give up.

Mani