SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Final Frontier - Online Remote Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: agent99 who wrote (7955)2/7/2000 9:33:00 PM
From: LPS5  Respond to of 12617
 
"...Another strategy used by manipulators is called "musical chairs": trading the same stock over and over among a cabal of promoters to give the false appearance of wide investor interest. The market report might show 10,000 shares traded between 6 p.m. and 6: 15 p.m., when it was really 1,000 shares circulating among three evildoers..."

No, it's not called "musical chairs." Where do they get this stuff?

It's a fraudulent practice that's been since before the 1929 market crash, and is called "painting the tape."

LPS5



To: agent99 who wrote (7955)2/8/2000 12:22:00 PM
From: TFF  Respond to of 12617
 
Reuters Unveils Net Strategy, Shares Soar, Instinet to Issue shares
By Ben Hirschler

LONDON (Reuters) - News and information company Reuters Group Plc on Tuesday laid out a strategy to tap millions of new customers using Internet technology, sending its shares soaring 23 percent to a record finish.

The company, criticised in the past by analysts for being too slow to embrace new media, announced a 500 million pound ($802 million) plan to move its core business to the Net, a board shake-up and a nine percent rise in 1999 pre-tax profit to 632 million pounds.

Chief Executive Peter Job said there were more than 60 million people around the world who were targets for buying shares on the Internet while another 150 million were potential consumers of Reuters news and data.

But the group warned that a 300 million pound reorganization charge, half to be taken this year, would hit 2000 profits.

Reuters said it was preparing for a partial flotation of its Greenhouse Fund, which had quoted investments in Internet start-ups worth 438 million pounds at the end of 1999, plus millions more in unlisted firms.

An IPO for U.S.-based electronic brokerage Instinet -- which aims to launch a fixed income product in the second quarter and a retail offering mid-year -- is under consideration.

The shares surged 23 percent or 2.32 pounds to end at 12.39 pounds, shaking off a brief initial wobble as the market digested the news.

``Like a phoenix out of the ashes, Reuters has successfully reinvented itself as an Internet stock,' said Simon Baker, media analyst at stockbroker Teather & Greenwood, who is assessing his position on the stock.

Anthony de Larrinaga of SG Securities, who has a ``buy' on Reuters, said: ``It's jam tomorrow, pain today...analysts will be cutting back their 2000 forecasts to take into account the Internet investments. But they'll pay off in 2001 and 2002.'

HEAVY INTERNET INVESTMENT

Reuters said it would spend 500 million pounds over the next four years migrating its services to Internet technology, giving it access to a vast new customer base.

``The Internet has...enabled us for the first time to start serving an infinitely wider market, including individuals making financial decisions at home and at work,' Job said.

``You can really now talk about delivering for less than $100 (a month)...that is the new price point that intranets and the Internet is opening up to us.'

Job predicted this low-tier information market would be worth $1 billion within three years, offsetting pedestrian growth of 5-10 percent in professional trading rooms.

Stewart Methven of Edinburgh Fund Managers, who holds Reuters, said institutional investors were relieved at the decisive steps after uncertainty about strategy last year.

``At the end of last year the market was looking at a glass that was half empty -- now it is half full. The share price reflects relief that they are on the right path,' he said.

``Reuters has the experience of delivering value to shareholders, which is an untested area for a lot of the new technology stocks.'

Reuters said the reorganization, and investment of 50 million pounds a year to develop e-architecture, would provide cost savings of 150 million a year by 2002.

The company also unveiled plans for a new consumer finance portal, to be launched mid-year, and a 50-50 joint venture with U.S.-based Multex.com Inc offering broker research aimed at European private investors.

Another new company, to be formed with wireless data technology firm Aether Systems Inc, will service the European wireless application market.

These new initiatives followed last week's announcement that Reuters was putting some of its global network assets into a joint venture with data firm Equant NV to offer financial firms a secure global Internet-standard network.

There had also been speculation that Reuters might announce a further sale of its stake in TIBCO Software Inc but Job said there were no plans to cut the 63 percent holding.

TRADING SYSTEMS WEIGH ON RESULTS

Reuters said its 1999 results were held back by a fall in contribution from Trading Systems, hit by lower foreign exchange volumes and customer system freezes ahead of the millennium.

Group pre-tax earnings rose nine percent at actual exchange rates to 632 million pounds and earnings per share grew 13 percent to 30.2 pence. Disposals, mainly from Greenhouse Fund investments, contributed 50 million pounds, against 26 million in 1998. Last year's successful IPO of a stake in TIBCO resulted in an accounting profit of 52 million, Reuters said.

The results were broadly in line with analyst expectations, after taking account of amortization and disposals.

The company is shaking up its organization, merging its Global Sales and Operations unit into its core financial Information unit and grouping this together with its Trading Systems Division under the umbrella Reuters Financial.

Reuters Financial will take a reorganization charge of 300 million pounds over the next two years, of which half will come this year. It will invest an extra 50 million pounds a year to develop its e-architecture.

Both measures are expected to deliver cost savings of 150 million pounds per year by 2002 but Reuters Financial profit will be ``significantly lower' this year because of the charges.

Instinet continues as a standalone business, while the company's businesses outside the financial markets -- including traditional and new media -- will be renamed Reuterspace.

Two long-time senior executives, Andre Villeneuve and David Ure, are to leave Reuters board and Philip Green, the former DHL International executive recruited last year to run Trading Systems, joins the board.

Those moves followed the surprise departure from the company last month of veteran John Parcell, a board member who ran the core Information division. Tom Glocer, president Reuters America, becomes chief executive of the Information business.

Reuters underlying revenue for 1999, excluding two businesses spun off last year, rose four percent at actual rates and two percent at comparable rates to 3.08 billion pounds.

Contribution from the core financial information business rocketed 52 percent at comparable rates of exchange to 253 million pounds, helped by a one-off improvement in data costs and savings associated with a restructuring last year.

Trading Systems contribution fell 21 percent at comparable rates of exchange to 230 million pounds and contribution at Instinet declined 18 percent at comparable rates to 129 million.

Reuters Ventures, which groups traditional and new media business as well as other ventures outside the core financial markets, cut its losses to 15 million pounds from 27 million. ($1-.6233 Pound) Reut11:47 02-08-00



To: agent99 who wrote (7955)2/13/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: TFF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12617
 
Swing Trading' a Growing Lure for Online Investors

Stocks: New breed of market player tries to ride moves lasting up to two weeks--a strategy that could be called Day Trading Lite.
By WALTER HAMILTON, Times Staff Writer

Don't even ask Gail Jackson about day trading. The 52-year-old Floridian day traded stocks for a year, and ended up with $75,000 in losses and a slew of emotional scars to show for it.
"It really did a number on me," said Jackson, a semiretired small-business owner. "I'd just sweat and get a headache. I'd get nauseous. It was just an awful, awful feeling."
So has Jackson morphed into a conservative buy-and-hold investor? Hardly. She's now a "swing trader." Rather than trading in and out of a stock on the same day, swing traders typically buy a stock one day with the goal of selling at a profit a day or several days later.
Think of it as Day Trading Lite. Whereas day traders seek to profit from momentary fluctuations in stock prices, swing traders try to ride moves that can last anywhere from two days to two weeks.
The rise of swing trading among the burgeoning ranks of online investors is another explanation for the explosion of stock trading volume in general over the last few quarters, particularly for Nasdaq stocks.
Many professional Wall Street traders have insisted that most people who try their hands at active trading don't make money, after counting commissions and taxes.
But soaring Nasdaq volumes, and wild moves in individual technology stocks, make it clear that many individuals are hooked on the action--helping to fuel continued volatility in the market overall.
For burned-out day traders, the less frenetic pace of swing trading offers new hope: the idea that handsome profits can be had if only they can latch onto the right trading style.
"I love the swing trading. My gains have been much better, and it seems like it's not as stressful," Jackson said.
"The swing-trading style is the style of the future," proclaimed Oliver Velez, chief executive of Pristine.com, one of the longest-running Internet trading sites, which promotes swing trading and day trading.
But to doubters, swing trading is nothing more than day trading cloaked in a politically correct marketing spin. Both styles rely on the same risky "momentum" strategy--chasing stocks that are already hot. And there's just as much risk that stocks can go suddenly awry on swing traders and saddle them with bruising losses.

A Hidden Risk
Swing trading "creates the illusion that it's less risky" but "it's very much the same," said Tim Bourquin, co-founder of DayTraders USA, a large group of day traders.
"It's a lot more fashionable now to say, 'I'm a swing trader' rather than 'I'm a day trader,' " Bourquin said. "People feel it doesn't carry the stigma of, 'Oh, you're a day trader. You're throwing your money away.' It seems to them like it's more socially acceptable."
Yet swing trading may actually be riskier than day trading for some newcomers, because they may be lulled into the belief that they can trade as a hobby and don't have to keep a vigilant watch over the stocks they own.
Be that as it may, the number of Web sites devoted to swing trading appears to be increasing, and some sites that had previously catered to day traders are rushing to add swing-trading services.
For example, the site through which Jackson trades, MTrader.com, added a swing-trading chat room last year after starting out as a day-traders' haunt in February 1997.
"There's a ton of people who have tried [day trading] and have washed out, and they're not in the game anymore," said Brandon Fredrickson, who runs MTrader.com's swing-trading operation. "And they're coming back and saying, 'Well, let's try this out.' Because it's easier for some people. It's slower. It's not as frantic."
Fredrickson estimates that about half of the 97 people who fork over $100 a month for access to his chat room are former day traders. And about 15 to 20 people a day are signing up for trial memberships, he said.
"Usually, we get them after [day trading] has just kicked them in the gut," said Jeff Tappan, MTrader.com co-founder.
Swing-trading sites dish out stock picks, and some have chat rooms in which head traders engage in dialogue with members about buying and selling.
They preach as gospel that swing trading is inherently less risky than day trading--but still quite lucrative.
The aim of day trading is to buy stocks--usually technology issues--that fluctuate wildly during the day, ride them up as little as an eighth of a point (13 cents a share) and sell them, hoping to repeat the process dozens of times a day.
To turn the fractional gains on each trade into big money, day traders typically buy 1,000 shares or more at a time.
The danger, of course, is that even a few half-point setbacks in a stock during the course of the day can mean big losses.
Swing traders, by contrast, typically sit through intra-day gyrations, hoping that a stock's general trend over a day or two will be clearly up, or clearly down.
A common swing strategy is to seek stocks that have risen strongly recently but are now easing back on light profit taking. The central idea: Jump on board quickly if the climb resumes.
Because they're shooting for several points of profit on each stock rather than fractional gains, swing traders say, there's less pressure to buy and sell at precisely the right moments. They also don't need to buy the most volatile stocks or buy a large number of shares, proponents say.
And whereas day traders need sophisticated computer hook-ups to trade, swing traders generally can get by with only a basic PC and an online connection.

More Time to React
What's more, swing traders say, they save on commission costs by trading less frequently, and have time to study the trading patterns of stocks before rushing into them.
Perhaps most important, swing traders say, they can enter so-called stop-loss orders, which are designed to contain losses by instructing a broker to automatically sell a stock if it falls to a certain level.
Day traders, by contrast, must make split-second decisions, and the mechanics of their trading style don't allow for stop-loss orders.
"I like swing trading because I know what the stock is, I know what the stock does and I know why I'm entering the trade," said Deborah McClure, a married mother of two from Abilene, Texas, who says she made more than $100,000 in her 18 months of day trading but quit because of the stress.
"In day trading, I don't know what it [a stock] is, I don't care what it is. It's just four letters [a stock symbol] to me, and I'm looking for a move," she added. "I just sleep better this way."
McClure, who owns a pair of independent bookstores and claims to have tripled her money in six months of swing trading, likes that she no longer has to sit glued in front of a computer screen all day. Now, she can run errands or pick up her children from school during the trading day.
"If I run to the restaurant next door to get a soup and sandwich I'm not panicking, 'Oh my gosh, I could be losing thousands of dollars while I'm standing here waiting on a sandwich,' " she said.
But she acknowledges that the relatively slower pace of swing trading took some time to get used to. "For a lot of us who are reformed day traders, we'll say, 'God, this is so slow.' Then we have to calm down and say, 'Oh wait, that's what we want. Slow and steady is good,' " she said.
One of McClure's favorite stocks to trade is Montreal-based Optimal Robotics Corp., which makes supermarket devices that let shoppers scan, bag and pay for groceries without waiting in a checkout line.
From mid-October through the end of last year, she bought and sold Optimal Robotics shares in a sequence of seven trades, earning a total of $4,958.75 after commissions but before taxes.
The shortest period she owned the stock was less than one day, and the longest was 15 days. McClure likes the stock because its moves are sedate compared to fast-moving Internet stocks. And she has used the company's scanning technology at her local grocery.
When stocks fall, day traders are taught to sell immediately to prevent knockout losses. But when Optimal Robotics has stumbled, McClure has held on in the belief that the shares will rebound. Until now, at least, they always have.
"It doesn't have the big news that's going to cause the big shakes. It's a pretty stable company," she reasoned. "I wouldn't do this with Amazon. I wouldn't do it with AOL. But this is a company that makes a product that I can go see, and to me that makes a difference."
Swing-trading proponents claim that novice investors are more successful at swing trading.
"We have had a lot greater success teaching people how to calmly make money with a swing-trading style than frenetically trying to do it with the conventional day-trading style," Velez said.
As a group, about 85% of swing traders and day traders lose money within the first six months, he said.
His belief that there's a higher swing-trader success rate is based on his anecdotal impression, Velez acknowledged; he has no specific swing-trading figures to back up his position.
Critics say swing trading, like day trading, is just another form of legal gambling.
Swing traders generally don't research company earnings or the prospects for the companies' products. They try to size up winners based solely on the look of their stock charts. In essence, they're seeking the same momentum ride as day traders, only for a slightly longer period of time.

'It's Not Easier'
"In reality, it's not easier" to swing trade, Bourquin said. "It [just] gives people the illusion that it's easier."
Adds Bradley Skolnik, the state securities commissioner in Indiana: "It's just a slightly different wrinkle on the old day-trading game," he said. "Instead of day trading, it's a form of 'days' trading."
But the desire to be in on the market game--and, of course, the desire to make a killing--keeps many investors enthralled with trading.
After losing $400,000 in day trading, one La Puente man, who asked that his name not be used, said he decided to quit trading altogether. But after discovering swing trading, he sold his business last year to raise the cash to give trading one more shot.
"If I didn't think I'd be a good trader, I wouldn't be trading again with those kind of losses," he insisted. "I'm not a gambler."