Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (65768)	2/8/2000 12:52:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Some favored a bi- national solution (one state, two peoples), but were thwarted, both by Zionists of other views, and by Arab rejection.....>> This idea never had a chance. This region will not rest until judgement day. <<I am not sure why Western interests would not like to see the current impasse replaced with a cooperation on security matters, though.>> The establishment of Isreal was supported by non-Zionists largely because it represented an economic foothold to an otherwise inaccessable middle eastern resource. The Alaska of the middle east in some respects. Zionists have a very different view of whats up with Isreal. We (Americans) are going to have our come uppance in the next decade, IMO. If I were Jewish I would be terrified at the thought of stability and cooperation of the neighboring Arab countries. This has a serious impact on American policy in the region. If I were a gringo I'd be perfectly happy with the state of affairs as they are (Them thar Isrealis are ma buds).