Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6593)	2/8/2000 6:07:00 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

You are lying. I said sales were "negligible". Ok, you didn't exactly say that retail sales would be zero. You said "Sales will be near-zero at retail." Message 10461843 That's close enough to zero for me. More importantly, your comment doesn't fairly characterize sales at the retail level, which were in the top 2% of the cough and cold category in November and December. If they maintain that pace, Zicam would be one of the top selling cold remedies this year. <The "clinical studies" sponsored by the company are a farce and not publishable in any respected medical journal.> There you go sticking your foot in your mouth again with stupid statements. There's no way that you could possibly know if the independent study will be accepted for publication and you don't know if it is a farce until you review the data. <You are lying. I never said "0 reorders".> Are you sure about that? "In other words there's no push-through and no reorders. So basically, the crooks at GUMM have made initial shipments to some retailers...period." Message 12074312 Next time you might want to cover your tracks better. <This is absolutely correct. Hoemopathy (sic) - nearly by definition - is fraudulent medicine. This is not disputable, and there is absolutely zero scientific evidence that Homeopathic medications work.> I'm tired of debating this point with you over and over again. I provided link after link to research on the Internet that refutes your bogus claim. I would agree that many homeopathic remedies are fraudulent, but not ALL of them. The FDA allows Zicam to be LABELED as homeopathic because its active ingredient is approved in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States. The efficacy of Zicam, which has nothing to do with how it is labeled, has been proven in two separate clinical studies irregardless of whether you accept the results. <The GUMM stock fraud will eventually - and inevitably - trade in the low single diogits (sic)> IMO, GUMM will eventually - and inevitably - trade over $100 and have earnings per share in the low single digits. PS to Dale: I was trying to ask for things that Bill has been proven correct on regarding GUMM, not other stocks. Sorry for not being more specific.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6593)	2/9/2000 12:07:00 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

I am 100% correct about the GUMM stock fraud. The results speak for themselves: 1) There is zero scientific evidence that Zicam works. The "clinical studies" sponsored by the company are a farce and not publishable in any respected medical journal. 2) Zicam's earnings report was horrible, and sales of Zicam - past the small hype phase - are in the toilet. Ignorance is bliss Wexler and you are the most ignorant person I know. What is amazing is that you aren't in jail doing time for your irresponsible comments. Truth means absolutely nothing to you. The blatant lies of a two bit hustler have no long term impact...which is the problem with lies. So have fun while you can. There are no single digits in the future share price of this company. "Zicam's earnings report was horrible".... Right and we have your word on that. I can remember when you acted willing to bet that the company would never have earnings. Your time is running out, Fraud!