SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Chief who wrote (1685)2/9/2000 12:14:00 AM
From: CIMA  Respond to of 1996
 
Drug Cartels Forced to Rethink Trafficking Routes

Summary

The recent seizure of 9.7 tons of cocaine in Chile, the third
largest haul in history, has law enforcement officials focusing
their interdiction efforts on the Southern Cone of South America.
The additional scrutiny on new routes for shipping drugs means that
the Southern Cone will likely experience an increase in drug-
related violence and crime, and that the drug cartels will
eventually look for new exit points from South America. These new
routes could result in narcotics eventually flowing through
countries less willing to cooperate in counter-narcotics efforts
with the United States.

Analysis

On Jan. 16 law enforcement officials seized cocaine valued at about
$500 million in the Chilean Pacific port of Arica. The bust in
Chile is evidence of what anti-drug officials have suspected for
some time now: Drug cartels are using Chile and Argentina as
transit points for shipping narcotics to Europe and the United
States. Although it costs more than using a direct route,
traffickers believe it to be a less risky method of shipment.

Traffickers have gravitated toward Chile because shipments with a
Chilean inspection stamp arouse less suspicion and are less likely
to be searched by customs agents. A 1999 State Department report
said that Argentina and Chile are being used by drug cartels for
transit points due to the clean reputations of those countries. The
added cost of shipping narcotics via a less direct route is more
than compensated for by the loss of fewer shipments, especially
given the tremendous profit margins involved.

The Arica seizure confirms that this is the cartels' new strategy
for attempting to avoid law enforcement efforts. It is likely to
cause law enforcement assets to focus more attention on the
Southern Cone. Anti-drug agencies have already taken steps in that
direction. In 1999 the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) began
training an Argentine counter-narcotics unit known as the Northern
Border Task Force. This elite unit is charged with intercepting
drug shipments flowing through Argentina from Brazil, Paraguay,
Peru and Colombia.

The most immediate result of this additional pressure will be drug-
related crime and violence. Stepped up enforcement activities will
bring customs and anti-drug units in direct contact with
traffickers. Faced with this eventuality, traffickers will react
first by resorting to bribery and then using violence to protect
their routes and shipments. Drug cartels often overcome legal
entanglements by first offering money. If this is not enough to
secure cooperation, then the threat of physical harm is used.

As the cost of doing business in the Southern Cone increases, drug
chieftains will likely look for less expensive routes - often,
these are the ones that offer the least resistance. Using the
Southern Cone demonstrates that cartels can easily afford the added
cost of shipping drugs indirectly. Further, drug lords don't balk
at the prospect of paying thousands of extra dollars in bribes to
get drugs past customs. However, cartel chieftains cannot tolerate
losing multi-million dollar shipments, the end result of more law
enforcement activity in the Southern Cone. At some point the
cartels will decide to cut their losses and adopt a new strategy.

In part, this new strategy will undoubtedly entail avoiding - as
much as possible - counter-narcotics activities of the United
States in South America. U.S. assistance is an integral part of
counter-narcotics efforts in Latin America. The United States has
assets and funding that Latin American countries do not possess to
fight the drug war. In order to avoid losses to law enforcement
activities, traffickers are likely to shift activities to transit
countries that are less cooperative with the United States, such as
Venezuela.

Relations between Washington and Caracas are certainly not openly
hostile; however, there are signs of growing tension. Venezuelan
Foreign Minister Jose Vicente Rangel recently criticized the U.S.
ambassador over comments made by U.S. Under Secretary of State for
Latin America Peter Romero directed against the administration of
President Hugo Chavez. Immediately after Romero's inflammatory
remarks, Chavez himself made pointed retorts Feb. 2 about the
international community respecting Venezuela's sovereignty.

An incident more directly related to poor counter-narcotics
cooperation between the United States and Venezuela occurred last
May when a U.S. counter-narcotics aircraft was denied access to
Venezuelan airspace. Chavez was sending a message to the United
States that Venezuela will be responsible for guarding its own
borders without interference from Washington. This same sentiment
was reflected recently when Chavez refused to allow U.S. troops on
Venezuelan soil to aid in disaster relief operations. The
government accepted material assistance, but declined the offer of
U.S. soldiers to lend a helping hand in cleaning up after mudslides
and flooding devastated parts of the country.

Additional law enforcement activity in the Southern Cone region
will cause cartels to re-think their trafficking routes. But this
will not happen immediately. Until it does, Argentina and Chile
will have to endure the problems associated with drug trafficking.
Increased trafficking activity in the Southern Cone will bring the
same corruption and violence that plague Colombia and other
traditional transit countries. If drug lords stay true to form,
they will undoubtedly seek the path of least resistance in
transporting narcotics. With relations between the Washington and
Caracas increasingly tense, Venezuela could become the next target
country for shipping drugs out of South America.

(c) 2000 WNI, Inc. stratfor.com

__________________________________________________

SUBSCRIBE to FREE, DAILY GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE UPDATES by clicking on
stratfor.com

UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THE GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE UPDATES (GIU)
stratfor.com

or send your name, title, organization, address, phone number, and
e-mail to alert@stratfor.com
___________________________________________________

STRATFOR.COM 504 Lavaca, Suite 1100 Austin, TX 78701
Phone: 512-583-5000 Fax: 512-583-5025
Internet: stratfor.com
Email: info@stratfor.com
___________________________________________________




To: the Chief who wrote (1685)2/9/2000 3:03:00 PM
From: kidl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1996
 
Looks like we got us a new wall:

Bid Ask
#Ord #Sh Price Price #Sh #Ord
1 500 0.47 0.48 3,000 1
1 7,000 0.46 0.49 26,500 4
1 6,000 0.45 0.50 158,000 3
1 7,000 0.44 0.51 31,500 2
3 45,000 0.43 0.52 46,000 5