SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (39480)2/9/2000 10:54:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
Heinz due to the low posting volume on this tread and the euphoria on CSCO tread I bought another lot of USPIX in my IRA account.

Sold out all my treasury bonds today as I do not like the golds - e.g. market may realize inflationary pressures and the divergences between the SPX and NAZ.


BWDIK
Haim



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (39480)2/10/2000 7:06:00 AM
From: Robert Schling  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Heinz,

Returning to my "black hole" analogy, here is some data to back it up (I'm sure you've seen this before, but this is the latest update):

cross-currents.net

Assuming that these statistics are correct, the ratio of mutual fund inflows to margin debt growth is particularly unsettling. Using the numbers in the report, margin debt increased $141 billion in 1999, versus mutual fund inflows of $186,8 billion. So we're talking about the same order of magnitude coming from each end! Stunning.

In November/December alone margin debt increased $46.3 billion, about 1,5x mutual fund inflows (using the annualized figures/12). Even more stunning.

If we add to this picture that mutual fund cash levels are at all-time lows, and the possibility of foreign selling once the cracks start to show, I can only conclude that major problems are just around the corner. The corner may be closer than we think.

The M2 to total market cap statistic in the report is also interesting, but we've been running at low levels since the early 90's. Hard to make a case from this analysis alone and I can't comment as to the relevance of M2 vs other liquidity measures for this type of argument.

I've been nibbling at shorts lately, and have been putting on option spreads to finance (from time decay) purchases of out of the money puts (DJX only since QQQ premiums are way too high, although the final slide down may be much more severe). If today's action confirms what we saw yesterday, I'll be back in with shorts.

Good trading.

Robert