Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (66379)	2/9/2000 9:55:00 AM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>> What idiocy it is to sell your winners because they are winners! I noticed they did not unload the stocks that went no where last year. In the words of Peter Lynch, your Trust Fund Managers are picking the roses and watering the weeds. It must be frustrating for you to see them collect management fees for their stupidity. Did your grandparents leave you a way to get out of their clutches? uf

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (66379)	2/9/2000 10:05:00 AM
From: TShirtPrinter	Respond to of 152472

I see Uncle FranQ asked the question I was going to. I'll tell you I had the similar experience with a full service broker. They told me if I could do a better job get another broker. I fired them the next day and couldn't be happier. As they said in the movie Pretty Woman, big mistake, or as Irwin Jacobs might say, very, very big mistake. Good luck, Tony

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (66379)	2/9/2000 10:36:00 AM
From: kech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Even the famous Gregg Powers was forced by his venture fund to sell some of his Q to rebalance the portfolio. This was definitely pre-split 4:1 and maybe even pre 2:1 split, when it was in the loft $200 range or so. As I recall, he was not very happy about it at the time.

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (66379)	2/9/2000 12:04:00 PM
From: gc	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

You are wrong. It is down because of earning prospect is lowered. It will NOT go up until its prospect changes for the better.