SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PAL who wrote (2544)2/9/2000 11:50:00 AM
From: Jill  Respond to of 8096
 
Great post, PAL, and glad to have you back actively on our thread again. I think the original was from PMS Witch rather than our esteemed Mark, but I just posted it to Loffy



To: PAL who wrote (2544)2/9/2000 11:55:00 AM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8096
 
(excuse the legalese ....)
There are several courses of action possible when you've
issued a statement which, taken by itself, out of context,
or having been mis-stated, is demonstrably false or non-sensical. Two of these courses, which are my best
guesses as to the two which edamo considered, are

1. Correct the mistake. Claim it wasn't meant literally,
or that by example it could be true in certain cases, or
that you simply misspoke.

2. Round up as much erroneous arguments as possible to
support the original statement, attack those who have
pointed out the mistake, etc.

edamo has obviously chosen the latter course. Now your
lecture on strategy etc. is interesting and it points to
my contention that even comparing the two approaches - selling puts and buying calls - is inappropriate, but the
proposition that the buying power used should be compared
is an absurdity.

To compare $1M in call purchases to $1M assignable stock
is also innapropriate, except that both have a maximum
loss of $1M less collected premiums. If the stock advances
then the result in one case is two islands, otherwise you
can buy two cafeteries with the 10% or so collected in puts.



To: PAL who wrote (2544)2/9/2000 12:08:00 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8096
 
Note: never never use the strategy of selling put to buy a stock.

As I understand this strategy, it is a technique to attempt to get a stock at a cheaper price. Are you saying, you don't use this approach or no one should. If the latter, why?

lurking...

lurqer