Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (12611)	2/9/2000 10:17:00 PM
From: charred	Respond to of 14627

Hello Claude, with no NSR, and the new property, FGX is probably a better buy than PFG. If you want to compare market caps, take a look at CD, or Cantex Mining Development. The company's market cap is 100,000,000, has about a 1 million in the bank, the recent drill program completed last year still has no assays to prove their gold property etc. I can't believe the price of this stock. Could be the short of the century. cheers

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (12611)	2/10/2000 10:38:00 AM
From: Quickdraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14627

Unbelievable! We've got Johnny Carson and Ed McMahon on the thread, one sets the other up. The only thing we are missing is the drum roll. Claude, you continue to post comparative stocks to the PFG thread ... Message 11857726 ... as you have done before. I really don't have a problem with this as I think Francisco Gold is way undervalued as is and it does give us a reality check. Perhaps their property acquisition is as good as Luicho, but somehow I doubt it. But I think you are doing a disservice to yourself and the respect people have for your analytical skills when you get into the type of, let's call it "leading" commentary you have with charred. You both have been posting for quite some time and should be well aware of each others styles/slants. Qd