Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Americo Burgos III who wrote (30979)	2/10/2000 12:35:00 AM
From: Mark Haddad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

ABIII, did you check out CITN. Again as I stated earlier this week if I am not mistaken, they had the "e" tagged on their symbol around 3 or 4 months ago. It was only on their symbol for a week or so.When it was added to their symbol the price went down less than $1. Within weeks of it being removed from their symbol, the stock ran a little, and then shot up to $8 from around $2. I am not trying to make the "e" a positive thing by any means, but I too believe GZ, and PNL management have done everything they can to help the SEC with their questions. Here is my view (or hedge), because of the good relationship the DOC has with PNL, (I believe we're the only .com company ever to join the DOC on a trade mission) and their obvious vision they must see in PNL, I believe this matter will take care of itself in the very near future; if they even have the "e" added, which I don't think will happen in my opinion. Everybody should think positive, the business plan hasn't been forgotten. The longs that have been here through the 8's and back down to the 1's understand this. LONG & STRONG KIDDO