To: Jim S who wrote (4657 ) 2/11/2000 9:34:00 AM From: lorrie coey Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 17683
I can only wonder, [rolling my eyes], why you're so invested in being 'baffled' by this 'theory'...You sure do play 'stupid' rather poorly...Are you a blonde, or do you just play one on TV...?The Dreaded HackAttack... I prefer to call it "InternetMerchandising", website/Brand positioning...it's modern business...I suppose you could say "collusion"...or "organized financial crime" of a most sophisticated and Supremely Deceptive nature...but that's Marketing. I think The NWO, or New Era also work well. "website owners hack themselves so they can't accomodate customers" It matters not 'who' does the spoofing and 'hacking'...if an OLB site is jammed, people can't access their accounts...This Favors the House, DUH. The goal is to 'accomodate' [institutional] shareholders, the real, controlling interests or 'owners' of these highly 'leveraged' ecommerce entities. -some of these hacked sites are OLBs, and those of us who use them can't trade" Exactly...[please don't feign ignorance here...] "this causes the Naz to go down, and the hacked sites shout with joy" No, no. The NAZ goes down when the Institutions Decide that the NAZ is going down... "the next day, the hacking stops, causing the Naz to go up on big volume.." LoL! The NAZ goes up on big volume when the Institutions Decide to get the NAZ up on big volume...! "the Feds know what happened, but they will find a scapegoat to blame so the general public will never find out what really happened." Now just what would happen to the idea of 'good faith and credit' if common folk had any inkling of the Truth...? Like I said...it's Big Time Wrestling.