Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (92423)	2/11/2000 8:47:00 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573745

elmer re..... I demand honesty and that means the rigorous publication of any Athlon and Irongate bug, just the way as Intel is doing it for a long time." EP..>>>>>>>> ELMER... <<<LOL>>> Im sorry I can't stop laughing in order to type.. You demanding honesty is like Bill Clinon demanding monogyny.

To: Elmer who wrote (92423)	3/17/2000 2:37:00 PM
From: ptanner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573745

Elmer <I have long been complaining about AMD's refusal to post their errata list. AMD refuses because they are simply too ashamed.> From JC's -- a message by Wolfe: There is a PDF on AMD's site with a short list of errata, see p. 4. It is up to number 6 but they skip two numbers. EDIT: Note: There can be missing errata numbers. Errata that have been resolved from early revisions of the processor have been deleted, and errata that have been reconsidered may have deleted or renumbered." Erasing the past? The errata are also all for the Model 1 A1 and A2 Athlon with none noted for the current Model 2. Here is the link to AMD: amd.com Select Item #22557, "AMD Athlon? Processor Revision Guide." There are also errata sheets for the 751, 756. And Athlon 900 has a 1/3 cache divisor (not 2/5 as previously reported). PT