Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (92536)	2/11/2000 2:38:00 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1573249

Elmer Re....... hmaly please clean your glasses and notice I am quoting someone else. EP >>>>>>>>> Elmer once again I have posted your reply to Paul. Now tell me that this paragraph starting with............ "I think consumers should demand a refund. This kind of poor quality is something the AMDites have long condemned. Do you think they will be fair and condemn AMD when it is their ox that is getting gored or do you think they will prove to be the hypocrites they are? Do you think Bill Jackson will post his outrage and demand the full errata list? Will Petz speakout? I don't think so." .... isn't you Elmer. How did Bill Jackson and Petz get into Tom's article? Note I reprinted your post in its totality to let other members of this board decide. Enjoy. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< To: Paul Engel who wrote (92418) From: Elmer Friday, February 11, 2000 2:02 AM ET Reply # of 92512 Re" Is AMD Covering Up Bugs In Their Products? This is an OUTRAGE !!! AMD investors should be DEMANDING Sanders RESIGNATION ! IRONGATE shipped before it was DEBUGGED PROPERLY !!! SHAME SHAME SHAME " I think consumers should demand a refund. This kind of poor quality is something the AMDites have long condemned. Do you think they will be fair and condemn AMD when it is their ox that is getting gored or do you think they will prove to be the hypocrites they are? Do you think Bill Jackson will post his outrage and demand the full errata list? Will Petz speakout? I don't think so. EP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

To: Elmer who wrote (92536)	2/11/2000 2:51:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 1573249

Fuddster Elmer, <because AMD refuses to publish the compiler options used, as required by SPEC> You little dolt: the Athlon-850 is a new product. Before scores are published on the SPEC.ORG site, officially, they need to be verified AS REQUIRED by SPEC. It takes time, their SPEC.org time. For previous Athlons, up to 750, the full official SPEC disclosure is published, by SPEC.org: spec.org If you scroll down the results, you will find out all compiler options used. It is very likely that the same set of options was used for higher-speed processors. Now remove your blunders and act as a men: stop generating unsubstantiated FUD. ( P.S. speaking about honesty: it is impossible to imagine a man that is so dumb as it follows from your posts. Therefore your agenda is clear for everyone here. P.P.S How's Intel FAB12 is doing? Any contaminations lately?