SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)2/11/2000 6:52:00 PM
From: RocketMan  Respond to of 35685
 
Having lived in Europe for many years, and marveled at their art, their history, and their civilized culture (with the exception of portions of Naples), there is one certainty that I took away: their telecom services suck and will always suck.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)2/11/2000 11:59:00 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 35685
 
Yes! and Yes! Best at applying acrylic toe nails. You'd be a piece of cake------------------9 toes. Save your toe because we in the South think there ain't nothing no better that a warm piece of toast, butter and toe jam.

dealer



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3536)2/12/2000 4:11:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 35685
 
>> correct me if I am wrong, anybody

Always my pleasure

key fact:
European corporations did almost nothing to advance the technology, only the
adoption and usage


1. I miss the distinction between advancing a technology vs adoption and usage. Aren't they the same thing?

2. If you mean proposing a new technology then adopting it, GSM is the
primo example.

3. Two more examples of new concepts advanced by european companies
a) ARM cores. Licensing proven designs for a RISC processor aimed squarely at portable devices
b) SIM cards. Simplifying cross network roaming in ways not possible in the US.

Europe thought they had established dominance in the wireless
telephone sector
ooops, wrong again, forgot to create the next generation
when it comes to technology, nothing but nothing stands still

Europe still has dominance. Look at the overall numbers for GSM vs CDMA. Regarding the maturity of markets, consider the penetration
of wirless in European countries, especially Scandinavia, where it is over 60%. US wireless penetration lags behind Europe and Japan.

US companies will not have a lock on 3G, as you imply. The Asian
companies will quite possibly take over from NOK ERICY and MOT in the handset arena. The infra market will be carved up by the current players ERICY, NORTEL and LU. QCOM has conceded the OEM spoils, by divesting themselves of the infra and handset divisions to focus on chipsets and IPR. Nothing wrong with that, but remember that QCOM is paying license fees to ARM.

t will be fun to watch Europe squirm in wireless data backwaters in coming months
This is just a plain dumb statement.

w.