Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (9155)	2/12/2000 2:39:00 PM
From: NickSE	Respond to of 42523

Subject 33361

To: MythMan who wrote (9155)	2/12/2000 3:19:00 PM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 42523

LOL.. i see somebody beat me to it -g-

To: MythMan who wrote (9155)	2/12/2000 7:52:00 PM
From: eddie r gammon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

Think I outta go over there? I could give um some realman feelings (g) erg

To: MythMan who wrote (9155)	2/13/2000 1:49:00 PM
From: IceShark	Respond to of 42523

Ho, ho ho. here is a guy that at least knows how to think straight. -g- Besides the obvious fact that Luc is nearly always wrong, I am not convinced that Nat gas fundamentals fit the oil model. Message 12858112

To: MythMan who wrote (9155)	2/13/2000 1:56:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

it doesn't make any difference, but... From Bloomberg: "The SEC chairman also warned investors to be wary of recommendations from Wall Street analysts, who increasingly have financial incentives to make positive comments about companies. Many of the analysts' firms have, or are seeking, investment- banking relationships with the companies under review, Levitt said. ''You can imagine how unpopular an analyst would be who downgrades his firm's best client,' Levitt said."