To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (19617 ) 2/13/2000 4:10:00 AM From: KW Wingman Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
You stated that you bonded with Ah and you referred indirectly to my post #412 on SR. My point is that the posting evidence on the SR thread shows that you were already bonded with AH for SEVEN MONTHS before I posted on SR. << It was, perhaps, this need to bond against such actions by you that was actually responsible for promoting an association between AHhaha and myself. Thanks >> My prior limited dialog with Ah in Dec 98 did not include you in any way (unless you may have had a prior bond with him). In any event, It was not I who caused you to bond. <<You had begun a dialog with Ah in December of 98, not in June of 99. The SR thread was launched in Nov. of 98.>> True, but the dialog in Dec 98 had nothing to do with you. My post #412 was in June of 99, seven months after the launch of SR. Do we need to go over how many times you posted with Ah again? Several people have posted news stories that AOL Case seems to be calling off his legion of PR dogs pushing for OA. The story give one an insight into AOLs lobbying and PR operations. Case (the weasel), sure knows how to pump and take care of his stock. It is well known that various interests hire PR people to pump certain stocks on the stock message boards and in other ways. It make a person wonder if fine companies such as AOL and US West would hire PR people to trash the opposition? How about a fund loaded with AOL stock? next para deleted - flame off - Lets drop it. You, purrrrrrty please, cut ATHM some slack rope, many of us are fed up with bad PR. Another thing: Think about why the recent hacker invasion is actually a positive for ATHM. KWW