Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry Olson who wrote (40115)	2/13/2000 10:37:00 AM
From: Benkea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

OJ: Glad yal enjoyed yourselves last night. "those losses are only on paper..meaningless...they fluctuate everyday like that.. the 21 billion is hard cash to invest..different..." The point is that $21 bil in inflows directly to the usual suspects is less than a small % one-day move for a couple of the 10 or 20 stocks getting the money. Thus, $21 bil is chump change.

To: Jerry Olson who wrote (40115)	2/13/2000 12:15:00 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

OK OJ .. Larry Flint .. being interviewed in LasVagas after winning 1 million at a high rollers table .. "You got to remember one thing .. winners do not pay for the light bills here." Wall Street is a selling machine. It gets it's paycheck when large numbers of little people buy high and then sell low the next week. Wall Street sells you stock .. who rides in the limmo? If buy and hold is so great, then why would you be able to buy any from Wall Street? They would keep it all. But lotsa little folks think that's the only way to go. 21 billion? should cover lunch.<g>