SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rudedog who wrote (27677)2/13/2000 4:21:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Solaris for X86 has pretty much the same problems...

How so? I've never heard anything about solx86 having a reliability issue. Let's throw Linux into the mix. After all, Solaris doesn't try to me the multi-purpose OS for commodity machines that NT and Linux do.

Let's just take Linux and NT. Which one has tne reliability problems. Why?

-JCJ



To: rudedog who wrote (27677)2/14/2000 3:06:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Respond to of 64865
 
the reasons for the lower reliability of NT are, as Paul pointed out, more a result of the fact that MSFT can not control the configuration that the OS runs on, which can include any damn fool combination of hardware that someone can put together, than any design weakness.

I can't think of a better endorsement of Solaris than this...



To: rudedog who wrote (27677)2/14/2000 4:54:00 PM
From: Lynn  Respond to of 64865
 
Thank you for your detailed explanation, rudedog. I learned a lot I did not know in that posting!

The new support model to be used with W2K in which people can call either MSFT or the OEM sounds like a step in the right direction (for a change). This support offering itself, if made widely known, should help with sales of higher line models to non-traditional "enterprise" line customers.

Regards,

Lynn

P.S. My Windows problem must have been a 'level 3.'