Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Burdell who wrote (20401)	2/13/2000 1:23:00 PM
From: jon_ewad	Respond to of 57584

George Burdell, Thanks for the reply but please elaborate. As you stated, <but I think the 5 for 1 split isn't realistic. That would take the price down to $5/share, if we doubled in price> Why would that be a bad thing? On the contrary I think more people would be inclined to buy at that price when you consider all that IAAC has going for it. Plus I believe the purpose of the split is to make the stock less volatile and more liquid so that institutional buyers would be attracted to it. Even with a 5 to 1 we're still only talking about a float of 9M. Regards,Wad. Edit: George, as for your concerns about IAAC having the "aroma" of a penny stock with a share price of $5, I think that they are negligable in that IAAC is listed on the NASDQ which would make it even more desirable at $5/ share. Plus it wouldn't be $5 for long IMHO.