Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (1485)	2/13/2000 2:53:00 PM
From: Cola Can	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

apii dynt onss, do we add to these dogs, or do we dump them? What does the thread think? (t/a on the 3 dogs is still well above all support lines I track, but I get slightly impatient when other picks are returning 20-500% per week. It's a conundrum) I think selling based on impatients isn't a good practice. You mentioned URMD and its good run. I held that stock for about 3 weeks. I also held SMTS for about 3 weeks. I try to spread my money around and I pick up some stocks that do run within a week. Such as VSTA and FTEC. These two ran 2 days after buying. But if the charts are still positive on a stock, I'll hold it. I didn't buy DYNT when it was first mention. It did a pretty good run from where it was at, and it seems to be consolidating on the pullback. The Money Stream and BOP still looks good. I bought in last Friday. I'm taking profit at least 2 times a week. Right now, I'm holding 16 stocks. I sold three this past week and picked up 3 more, plus I added to some of the stocks I think will run soon. CC

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (1485)	2/13/2000 3:04:00 PM
From: Wendisman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 48461

William, you leader dog.... It's not like you to remotely question your own judgement....it is very nice of you to ask our opinions on these issues, but you already have a direction....you just want to see how the lemmings react. I'll bite....where's the nearest cliff? <gg> I'll hold my core ONSS for better days....already sold the traders above 3....not quite free, but close enough. PARA changed its symbol to FIVE....fyi....holding those core shares from 1 5/16....love da rats.

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (1485)	2/13/2000 4:47:00 PM
From: George Burdell	Respond to of 48461

<apii dynt onss, do we add to these dogs, or do we dump them? What does the thread think? (t/a on the 3 dogs is still well above all support lines I track, but I get slightly impatient when other picks are returning 20-500% per week. It's a conundrum> Altern8 was right before - Message 12769256 Welcome back, fearless leader! GB

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (1485)	2/13/2000 9:08:00 PM
From: KevinThompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

onss, do we add to these dogs, or do we dump them? William, I seem to recall your definition of a rat dog as a stock that nobody else wants, is ignored, and undervalued. ONSS has extreme potential. So to answer your question, "do we dump them", I would have to respond - "What!, are you crazy?" This one will be a killer and make us a killing! The thing had quote: "Five-fold net earnings growth" in it's last report, and their patented real-time copier technology has barely even been announced. So, yes I did add some more. And I will buy even more if it gets closer to $2. (gee, do you think I'm bullish on On-Site?) Welcome back, KT

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (1485)	2/13/2000 10:32:00 PM
From: M. Walton	Respond to of 48461

Tsk tsk tsk... to ask such a question. To the formula we must be true - we "plan our trades and trade our plans". We choose these stocks when they are the least popular... that is why we buy them (I believe these are your words). The fact that they have not gained the instant recognition we have become accustomed to simply proves that they are the next generation of rat dogs to grace our kennels. But of course, WJ, you know this - it's like telling Einstein that E=mc2. <g> Patience, my friends... patience! Murphy