Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EISQ: Electronic Identification, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Theo who wrote (160)	2/13/2000 8:40:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213

Agreed. The "guilt by similarity" effect is the only negative I see for EISQ for the short run. IMO the Barrons reporters are very sloppy and lazy at DD, that's why they're incompetent when it comes to reporting on small companies where information has to be dug out and organized, as opposed to cut and paste journalism. The article they did on new tech battery technology, for example, was a joke, containing erroneous information, incomplete and poorly researched. Of course I may be a bit biased, being a Valence stockholder, the only company to succesfully mass produce lithium polymer batteries commercially, and not mentioned by the Barrons reporter who claimed the Japanese would be first to market and was using information that was SIX MONTHS old. Forbes and The WSJ fall in the same category; it's a matter of journalistic quality control. As I said, all this IMHO.