Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (17961)	2/14/2000 3:36:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Gilder Speaks on SONET No, this is not another tekboyish violation of copyright. The link is to a Forbes article: forbes.com Personally, I think Gilder is far sighted, but has trouble reading the near term. uf

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (17961)	2/14/2000 6:54:00 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 54805

Since they have vastly different numbers of shares issued, I don't understand why this is of any significance. Didn't say anything about shares outstanding, market caps, enterprise values, usw. Simply marking that today's date is one where Q's and C's prices "crossed", and at some point, one share of Q cost the same as one share of C, without any need to normalize to 100 or whatever. Like a "starting line" in the sand. Point is: will be interesting, from this hereby "marked", artificial starting point of share-price parity, to see how things go. By that, I don't mean just how each stock will fare, but how earnings per share, growth in eps, etc., will go.