SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rudedog who wrote (27737)2/14/2000 5:29:00 PM
From: alydar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Nice conversation we have going here. But the way I see it is that MSFT has some serious obstacles to overcome. A majority of corporate accounts will not even think of switching over to W2K until next year. I know several training specialists in the insurance industry and they are going to continue to purchase NT until W2K proves itself. At least a year away.

So, it is in the 2-3 year time period that W2K will have its greatest impact. In fact, it has been reported that W2K will dominate the server space in the 3-5 time frame. This would be great except for one minor detail. MSFT does not have a monopoly, as defined by the FOF, in server software as they do in the desktop. Therefore, there are alternatives that are better and cheaper. For instance, in 2-3 years Linux, most probably supplied by Redhat, will be a viable alternative and is FREE. Solaris will probably be offerred at or below W2K pricing. So what does MSFT have left? I think that W2K will be a commodity product with commodity pricing. You can pick Solaris, Linux, or W2K and each will serve their respective markets. The margins on these products are going to be small. How do you compete with FREE? MSFT needed to get this product out two years ago to make real (i.e., MSFT types of returns) for their sharholders.

IMO, W2K is a non-issue in the future of internet computing. The OS for the enterprise will be commodiditized in the time period before the product is widely accpeted. This is from a non-technical but from a marketing person who is not in the IT industry.

By the way, in the future, you will not need a OS IMO; just a browser for intranet and internet applications. An we know how much browsers cost these days. Thats my point.

Thanks for your time and I would appreciate any feedback.



To: rudedog who wrote (27737)2/14/2000 5:51:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
All right rudedog, since you are the expert in O/S design. Maybe
you can explain NT's thread model to the rest of us.



To: rudedog who wrote (27737)2/14/2000 11:57:00 PM
From: denizen48  Respond to of 64865
 
Here's an analogy of Mickey's business model:
An idiot sees a sign "Free River Rafting Trip" outside a travel agency, walks in, gets hit over the head & comes to on a log going down river. He asks the idiot on the next log, "Do they serve lunch on this trip?"
He responds,"They didn't last time."