Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles R who wrote (93144)	2/15/2000 12:55:00 AM
From: semiconeng	Respond to of 1571729

"Can you post a link to at least ONE of your "several" sources that say this." I Had a link that showed intel's ASP at 230-250, but now I can't find it. All I can find is this one from mid year 1999, that quotes $217. I do recall Craig Barrett saying that "ASP's Improved slightly in Q4", but since I can't find the specific link to prove it, I take back the $230-250 specific statement. eet.com "Intel is definitely seeing a financial impact from its pricing strategies," said Gwennap. "I don't think they want to be in a position where their ASPs continue to fall, because that will further push down their revenue, and ultimately their stock price. They definitely can't afford to see this price war spread into their Pentium line." He estimates that Intel's ASP fell last quarter from $225 to $217. "Needs $100-$130 for what?" edtn.com AMD's chairman and chief executive officer, W.J. Sanders III, has frequently said that his business model demands an average selling price of at least $100, but AMD....... eetimes.com Sanders said....... He has frequently said that his business model depends on an ASP for microprocessor products that tops $100. While the overall ASP for processors in the fourth quarter of 1999 was $80, that is up from previous quarters, where it had dipped as low as $65. SemiConEng