Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

discover

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (99097)	2/15/2000 4:33:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul - <Intel "SlipStreams" the Coppermine 128 into production ? Intel announced - with no fan fare - what appears to be the 128 K L2 cache version of the Coppermine - or Coppermine 128 - for Mobile applications. Higher Speed - up to 500 MHz & 100 MHz Bus & SSE and 0.18 micron process!> Interesting. You're right; not much fanfare. But these are Coppermine 128's in Mobile form. PB

To: Paul Engel who wrote (99097)	2/15/2000 8:58:00 AM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 186894

Hi pauL! Glad to see the pauL FUD pucker factor at an all time high this year! How is Yousef? Heard from him lately? Must be time to buy more AMD, eh pauL? Add to your 13% AMD holdings. Sorry about Gelsinger........Celery is a good chip! Benchmarks can be deceiving, huh? Is Willy coming out? ntel gonna try the 820 chipset again? Good for them. Maybe Rambust will fly this time. DELL can sell a ton of it. I heard they still got all of those floppermine/camino-go boxes out back they can use, increase their profits for next quarter. ntel is in good hands. I'm glad Andy Grove is leaving. I notice you are still violating the SI Terms of Use! "g) Posting improper or off-topic messages or posting more than twenty messages in six hours. h) Violating the letter or spirit of the Terms of Use." Recent posts by Paul Engel Subject: Intel Reply #99099, Date: Feb 15 2000 4:24AM PB & Intel Investors - Intel "SlipStreams" the Coppermine 128 into production... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93209, Date: Feb 15 2000 3:11AM TWY - re: ". I don't pretend to know if SUN ULTIMATELY came up with a good des... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93208, Date: Feb 15 2000 3:07AM SCUMbria - Re: "IA-64 presents some additional challenges to software developm... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93205, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:31AM Chuckles - Re: "You are talking about displacing Sun - the dominant, battle ha... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93203, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:29AM Chuckles - Re: "The biggest server vendor after Sun is Compaq. Compaq has an i... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93202, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:25AM Steve - Re: "With the Athlon, for at least the next 6 months, AMD is ready to... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93200, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:23AM TWY - Re: "If SUN did a good job on the UltraSparc III design, it should be a... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93198, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:16AM SCUMbria - Re: "The volumes of PIII will rise, and the volumes of Celeron will... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93197, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:11AM Steve - Re: "in fairness I must express my gratitude for your offering of a va... Subject: Intel Reply #99096, Date: Feb 15 2000 2:05AM Mula - re: "If small players can provide hardware (IA-64 boxes), Linux with va... Subject: Intel Reply #99095, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:59AM dmf - Re: "Would Intel refusing to support Solaris be seen as a little heavy h... Subject: Intel Reply #99094, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:56AM dmf - Re: ". Maybe Intel didn't want to be tied to Solaris, like it was to Win... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93185, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:45AM Chuckles - Re: "Merced without Sun seems more DOA than it ever was. The real b... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93180, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:34AM AlibiDan - Re: "An aggressive price war by Intel would take away that leverage... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93174, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:23AM SteveC - re: ". Intel is going to have to give up market share to AMD in order... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93167, Date: Feb 15 2000 1:10AM SCUMbria - Re: "The company which had the fastest parts prospered. Which one w... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93162, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:59AM Chuckles - Re: 'Do you think Intel and Sun are parting ways on Merced? The ant... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93156, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:46AM ALibiDan - re: "The price war is coming, don't doubt it for a minute - just gi... Subject: Intel Reply #99086, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:42AM Ten & Intel Investors - A Very Detailed Article about Intel's Diversification... Subject: Intel Reply #99084, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:36AM Ten - Re: "Wasn't John Hull saying something to this effect, that growth in As... Subject: Intel Reply #99083, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:34AM dmf - Re: ". Looks like Intel and Sun are going at it much like the Intel and... Subject: Intel Reply #99082, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:24AM SemiConEng & Intel Investors - Craig Barrett suffers NO FOOLS ! ... Subject: Intel Reply #99080, Date: Feb 15 2000 12:19AM Ram - Re: "All systems go! INTC is on its way to $ 150 " ... Subject: Intel Reply #99074, Date: Feb 14 2000 11:43PM Elmer & Intel Investors - Here's a REAL CLUE why Intel is capacity constrained... Subject: Advanced Micro Devices Reply #93135, Date: Feb 14 2000 11:34PM Chuckles - Re: "Now we know why you don't make too many price predictions. AMD... Subject: Intel Reply #99071, Date: Feb 14 2000 11:23PM Elmer & Intel Investors - A "Progress Report" on Intel's StrongARM Processor d... What a maroon. Make it so, Mysef